OMG UPDATE: Question? Answer.

Updated on Wednesday, January 28

#6824

QUESTION: Interesting question I've pondered for a while: do you think aesthetically pleasing campaign materials matter? Can we talk about Team Fusion's poorly coded website and amateur photography and photo editing vs. Team Gold's near professional work.

Note: I'm not talking about their platforms - that's a different discussion.

5 comments

  1. AnonymousJanuary 29, 2015 at 11:48 AM

    Honestly I think they are both pretty good.
    Unless someone's website is way too messy, I'd say it don't have much influence on my decision.

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousJanuary 29, 2015 at 2:35 PM

    ugh planted question. stop it team gold. you're turning me off.

    ReplyDelete
  3. AnonymousJanuary 29, 2015 at 8:52 PM

    OP here - I actually don't know nor am I partial to Team Gold. I'm just a design junkie who really appreciates hard work and effort towards aesthetics. Don't take it out on them.

    ReplyDelete
  4. AnonymousJanuary 29, 2015 at 10:22 PM

    Team Gold probably knows AFM/Math CA kids cause their site a total rip of all AFM club sites ie. UWAC, ACE, UW DECA
    Hell, their pictures are all taken in new HH the AFM building
    i just scrolled down, can confirm now

    ReplyDelete
  5. AnonymousJanuary 30, 2015 at 4:49 PM

    Eh, the second one is flashy but generic. The first one is a little clunky but just as serviceable. I really wouldn't rank one above the other.

    ReplyDelete