OMG UPDATE: Question? Answer.

Updated on Friday, May 16

#6506

QUESTION: POF vs OkCupid?

10 comments

  1. Screw that noise. Tinder, FTW.

    ReplyDelete
  2. PoF seemed "crappy" to me, I closed my OKC account recently, wasn't getting me anywhere - I was pointlessly wasting time on it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. PoF has a lot more people but OKC has a higher proportion of tumblrinas and non-country girls, depends on what you're looking for i guess. OKC also has a much better interface but PoF is still pretty good for a free site

    ReplyDelete
  4. Closed both of my accounts recently, no one really interested me. A LOT of country girls on PoF so if you're into that good (I'm not).

    ReplyDelete
  5. I met my current boyfriend on OKC right before both of us were about to deactivate our accounts. With a little luck you'll find the right big weirdo on that site.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I think it all depends on the type of person you are on these sites. I use PoF and I have had dates with about 10 guys after only about 2 months of use (Some of them are leading into second dates now). I feel it is easier for a female on these sites but at the same time you have to deal with the filth people message you. In any case you have to be willing to message someone and not just expect people to flock to you. On the site I do not use a picture and always initiate contact and it seems to be working fine for me so far.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. you probably messaged me but I never reply to someone without a picture.

      Delete
    2. +1 for initiating contact

      Delete
  7. I much preferred OKC. PoF looked like it was made by an amateur; it seemed very sketchy. I had a lot of luck on OKC and met my current boyfriend of two years on there.

    ReplyDelete