OMG UPDATE: Question? Answer.

Updated on Wednesday, February 19

#5954

QUESTION: Are there asexual males here at UW?

29 comments

  1. Yes: http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/3362206/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you so much for this link. In all seriousness, I just learned a lot about myself that I was always confused about and probably would have never realized otherwise.

      Delete
    2. Glad you enjoyed it. The dude in the article is a friend of mine... I took that picture of him in front of my house XD

      Delete
  2. I'm sure there are, I have yet to meet any guys whose swing (or lack thereof) is that way

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ever since Wikipedia became more mainstream everyone has a goddamn condition.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You're an idiot.

      Delete
    2. Man you are so right, this is some bs I just don't into.

      Delete
    3. or could it be that perhaps as science in various fields has progressed (especially the less visibly obvious ones to do with the mind/cognition), we've been able to clearly outline and understand certain conditions?

      Delete
  4. Many aces say they think of nothing when they masturbate, while a handful indicated that certain fetishes, like BDSM, come to mind.


    I wonder how many of these "aces" aren't just masturbating a bit too much

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. How the fuck do you think of nothing? At the very least, I'd think about OP's mom.

      Delete
    2. @5a- asexuals can have a sex drive without sexual attraction to a gender, person, etc. Your sex drive and sexual attraction are two different things, so yes, it is possible to think of nothing.

      Delete
  5. you people will come up with a name for anything

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I definitely understand you and 4, with the rise of Tumblr and SJW's and the "I am a pandemisexual trans dragon, down with the cisscum!" adjective syndrome, but when it comes to reasonable _sexuality it logically must exist. If you can be attracted to the same sex, the opposite sex, or both, surely you can be attracted to neither.

      Delete
    2. ^evolutionarily how? Every one is born and all their ancestors were fucking like rabbits.

      Delete
    3. @6 (and @4)- As an asexual person, I find your comment insulting. I am sure you identify in some way with a sexual orientation (whether straight, gay, bi, etc.). For us it is no different. Before you pass judgment, I suggest you education yourself on the issue: http://www.asexuality.org/home/@

      Delete
    4. ^Evolution doesn't necessitate that all traits have to be giving an advantage. This is true even from species that don't keep less-than-optimal individuals alive and reproducing like we do. Its why we're so damn populous and also why some people who would be dead in 20min in the wild are doing just fine.

      Delete
    5. @6.c

      I am sorry.
      I guess it's only natural to want to define the way we feel and think.
      It was not meant as an insult to those who identify with asexuality.
      I can't say I identify with any particular sexual orientation.

      Delete
    6. @6c, there is something there. Even if its weak, there is something there. Like a kid who became a vegetarian because her mom could only microwave dollarmart chicken nuggets growing up, only to eat at a fine restaurant one day and taste real meat, you will find someone who gets you off.

      Delete
    7. ^dat analogy omf

      Delete
  6. 6f- WOW. I don't even know how to respond to this. Asexuality is a legitimate sexual orientation, albeit very misunderstood. Would you say the same thing to someone who is gay? That they just haven't met the right opposite-sex partner? I realize that it can be hard to understand how someone can be asexual or identify as asexual, and I am sorry that you are unable to comprehend it. However, I think we owe each other the mutual respect to support other people's orientations.

    PS- Thank you 6E for the apology :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sexual orientation means orientation of sex. Asexual is not an orientation, by definition, because it has nothing to do with sex. Like asking an atheist if they're protestant or catholic. If you don't have normal sexual functioning, you're probably just a female. Because females don't have sex drives.

      Delete
    2. @7a, you're not funny. Such a tasteless joke in a mature conversation.

      Delete
    3. Jesus christ 7a, you're clueless. Just because you can't get laid doesn't mean women don't have sex drives.

      Delete
    4. 7a, you're an idiot

      Delete
  7. Everyone is just caught up in the game of identity. When you label yourself, function in the identity, waste all your energy defending it and then die asking yourself: Who am I?

    Give it up people. Reality doesn't care what you're labelled. It's all a silly human-made game... you're over-complicating things.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 6 million were labeled "Jew" and it didn't turn out well for them,

      Delete
    2. ^ - Good example on how insane labeling is.

      Delete
    3. 8.a/b that is the stupidest fucking thing i ever heard they ARE jewish, jewish is a RELIGION, im pretty sure they want to be called jewish. fucking hipster retards trying to call everything a label, get over yourselves

      Delete